Arbitration Tribunal and Arbitrators, Number of Arbitrators

Introduction

After parties decide to submit their dispute to arbitration, Who will give judgement on their dispute ? Of course Arbitrator. How these arbitrators are appointed ? What procedures are followed for appointment of these arbitrators ? If any of the arbitrator is not acting impartially can he be removed ?

Chapter 3, Part 1 of Arbitration and Conciliation act from section 10-15 deals with all of these question.

Arbitration Tribunal

First, Arbitration Tribunal and Arbitrator are same terms. They can be used interchangeably.

Section 2(1)(d) of the act defines as a sole arbitrator or a panel of arbitrators.

Arbitration tribunal is nothing but a adjudicating body deciding upon the disputes submitted to them. They have certain powers and act in quasi judicial capacity.

These tribunals are not courts. Many  a times government establishes a statutory bodies like National Green Tribunal who decides cases related to environment.

Who is Arbitrator ?

In layman terms, Arbitrator is private judge who gives judgement on matter referred to him. (Khap Panchayat uncle is one example!) 

He is person
  • who is chosen by Parties by consent
  • In some case is appointed by Court when parties fail to appoint
  • He does not sit in public
  • He is paid by the parties
  • His jurisdiction, authorities, powers are granted by parties.
  • Capable of entering into contracts
  • Unbiased. Not like biased journalist who takes political sides 
 Parties have autonomy to appoint anybody as an arbitrator. But some procedure is provided in the act and also there is a provision related to number of arbitrators.

How many arbitrators should be appointed ?

If you appoint only one arbitrator 
  • There would be quick decision
  • Less cost
  • However, there is chance of decision could not be of holistic or well thought as there is lack of diversity. That's why we have benches in court. 2 is better than 1, and 3 is better than 2
  • In complex matter where multiple stream of knowledge is required, one arbitrator won't be able to decide award
If you appoint more arbitrators
  • Better decision
  • Decision on complex matter 
  • More cost
  • Co-ordination between multiple arbitrator is difficult and proceeding can take more time 

Section 10 deals with number of arbitrator.it doesn't recommend any number. It states that number of arbitrators should be odd. Because majority can be decided when there are odd number of arbitrators.


Conclusion

Arbitration Act gives flexibility and autonomy to parties to appoint arbitrators. Section 10 deals with number of arbitrators. Arbitrator is appointed by consent of parties. What if there is no consensus reached by parties in appointment of parties ? Who will appoint then ? What is the procedure of appointment of arbitrators. This question will be dealt in this blog





Comments

Post a Comment

Followers

Popular posts from this blog

Privileges and Immunities to Administration in Suits

Introduction You know government can enter into contracts. Government can start some business. It mean government can sue other people, or you can sue the government. Before you initiate a legal proceedings against government, or even after legal proceedings are initiated, there are some relaxations to government.( OK, we will use Government/Administration as per our discretion interchangeably in this post, but they will mean the same ). So, it might happen that to prove something you may need a document or evidence, but government may be given exemption to produce evidence in that regard. Let's take one example.  General law is that burden of proof is on prosecution. Meaning, the one who accuses other  needs to prove the crime/offence by other. But when government accuses you of Sedition, you have to prove your innocence, burden of proof is on YOU. This is scary, as many times government in power just accuses people of sedition who opposes their ideas/policies, and put oppone...
Read more

Legal History-Administration of Justice in Bombay (1668-1726)

Image
Story About Bombay In 1534, Portuguese acquired Bombay from Local Hindu Raja. Then Bombay was given to King Charles II as dowry in his sister's marriage to in 1661. In 1668 Bombay was given to rent to East India Company for a rent of 10  £ . By today's exchange it would be around 100 Rs. So  yes, Bombay was given on rent to East India Company for the price of 10 Vada-Pav. Administration of Bombay was subordinate to Surat back then. After renting it, company issued a charter in 1668 granting company some rights to make laws to deal with Bombay. Like Administration in Madras, development of Earlier administration could be studied in 3 stages. First Stage: 1670-1683 (Aungier Eara) During this period Bombay was subordinated to Surat. The Governor of Surat was ex-officio Governor of Bombay, though Bombay had Deputy Governor and Council. Gerald Aungier brought some changes in Administration of justice. Two plans, i.e plan of 1670 and plan of 1672 made progress in so...
Read more

Overview of Appeal in CrPC

Image
Introduction Here is the simplistic hierarchy of the Courts. (JMFC stands for Judicial Magistrate of First Class) Not so serious cases are tackled by Lower courts. Serious cases are tackled by Sessions court.  We humans are not Gods. Courts are presided by humans and its possible that they can make a mistake. They should be remedy to people when courts commits  mistake. One of such remedy is Appeals. Remember this one, you don't have right of Appeal in all the cases even if you feel Court had committed some mistake. Criminal Procedure Code gives a right to appeal in specific circumstance.  CrPC provides circumstance when you CANNOT appeal. Apart from CrPC, constitution also have certain provisions related to Appeal. Specific laws like NIA Act, UAPA Act etc have provided separate procedure of Appeal.   In this post we will cover below things When you CANNOT appeal ? Who can appeal and for What purpose ? Appeals to Sessions Court Appeals to High Court Appeals to Suprem...
Read more