Who Shall Judge the Judges? Revisiting the NJAC Case (2015)
Who Shall Judge the Judges? Revisiting the NJAC Case (2015) Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. Union of India — popularly called the NJAC Case or the Fourth Judges Case — is one of the most consequential constitutional decisions delivered by the Supreme Court of India in the post-Kesavananda era. Pronounced on 16 October 2015 by a Constitution Bench of five Judges (Jagdish Singh Khehar, J. Chelameswar, Madan B. Lokur, Kurian Joseph and Adarsh Kumar Goel JJ.), the judgment runs to over a thousand pages and resolves, by a 4:1 majority , a question that had been debated in India almost continuously since the Constituent Assembly first convened in 1946: who should appoint the judges of the higher judiciary, and on what terms? The Court struck down both the Constitution (Ninety-ninth Amendment) Act, 2014 and the National Judicial Appointments Commission Act, 2014 as unconstitutional, holding that they violated the basic structure of the Constitution by compromising the...