Partnership Act- Admission of new partner-Incoming partner

Introduction

Partnership is based on mutual trust. One of the duties is to act honestly for the greatest common benefit of firm which we have already seen.

Chapter 5 of the partnership deals with how partner may be admitted, expelled, retired etc from section 31 to section 38.

Since this relationship is based on trust and faith, admission of partner too have certain restriction and can be admitted in certain manner only.

Section 31 lays out the modes for introduction of new partner in the firm. It also provides for liabilities of incoming partner or new partner.

Below are 3 modes of introduction of a partner

Introduction with consent of all partner

For mutual trust, this is general rule of admission of partner. It states that consent of ALL the partner is necessary for admission. This rule is for obvious reason, partner needs to be faithful to each other and hence consent of all the partner is necessary.

Introduction in accordance with contract between the partner

In partnership deed, partners may agree on certain way of introduction of new partner. For example, partners may agree that some of the partner may nominate new partner or admit partner by majority.

In such cases, some partner may not be happy with introduction of new partner, but they are bound by the contract. This position was stated in case of Lovergrove V Nelson.

To clarify this provision further, let's say there is partnership between 3 person A, B and C. They agree that A can nominate his son as partner.  In this case A may introduce other partner without the permission of other partners.

Introduction by the provision of section 30

In earlier article, we have discussed how minor can become regular partner in partnership firm as per he provision of section 30(5). 

When minor shares profit, after attaining majority (18 year of age) he can give public notice either to become a partner or not to become a partner. Such notice has to be given withing six months of his attaining majority.

Liability of incoming partner

The newly inducted partner will be liable for all acts of a firm after which he is admitted. For example Mr Mallya become partner of a firm "Kingfisher" on 1st Jan 2019. If this firm defaults loan in February 2019, then Mr Mallya become liable.

However, the incoming partner may agree to share liabilities of the firm for firm's act in the past. It mean in above example, Mr Mallya could expressly agree that he will share the liabilities for firm's act done before 1st Jan 2019. Who will do such agreement ?


Thanks

Comments

Post a Comment

Followers

Popular posts from this blog

Privileges and Immunities to Administration in Suits

Introduction You know government can enter into contracts. Government can start some business. It mean government can sue other people, or you can sue the government. Before you initiate a legal proceedings against government, or even after legal proceedings are initiated, there are some relaxations to government.( OK, we will use Government/Administration as per our discretion interchangeably in this post, but they will mean the same ). So, it might happen that to prove something you may need a document or evidence, but government may be given exemption to produce evidence in that regard. Let's take one example.  General law is that burden of proof is on prosecution. Meaning, the one who accuses other  needs to prove the crime/offence by other. But when government accuses you of Sedition, you have to prove your innocence, burden of proof is on YOU. This is scary, as many times government in power just accuses people of sedition who opposes their ideas/policies, and put oppone...
Read more

Legal History-Administration of Justice in Bombay (1668-1726)

Image
Story About Bombay In 1534, Portuguese acquired Bombay from Local Hindu Raja. Then Bombay was given to King Charles II as dowry in his sister's marriage to in 1661. In 1668 Bombay was given to rent to East India Company for a rent of 10  £ . By today's exchange it would be around 100 Rs. So  yes, Bombay was given on rent to East India Company for the price of 10 Vada-Pav. Administration of Bombay was subordinate to Surat back then. After renting it, company issued a charter in 1668 granting company some rights to make laws to deal with Bombay. Like Administration in Madras, development of Earlier administration could be studied in 3 stages. First Stage: 1670-1683 (Aungier Eara) During this period Bombay was subordinated to Surat. The Governor of Surat was ex-officio Governor of Bombay, though Bombay had Deputy Governor and Council. Gerald Aungier brought some changes in Administration of justice. Two plans, i.e plan of 1670 and plan of 1672 made progress in so...
Read more

Overview of Appeal in CrPC

Image
Introduction Here is the simplistic hierarchy of the Courts. (JMFC stands for Judicial Magistrate of First Class) Not so serious cases are tackled by Lower courts. Serious cases are tackled by Sessions court.  We humans are not Gods. Courts are presided by humans and its possible that they can make a mistake. They should be remedy to people when courts commits  mistake. One of such remedy is Appeals. Remember this one, you don't have right of Appeal in all the cases even if you feel Court had committed some mistake. Criminal Procedure Code gives a right to appeal in specific circumstance.  CrPC provides circumstance when you CANNOT appeal. Apart from CrPC, constitution also have certain provisions related to Appeal. Specific laws like NIA Act, UAPA Act etc have provided separate procedure of Appeal.   In this post we will cover below things When you CANNOT appeal ? Who can appeal and for What purpose ? Appeals to Sessions Court Appeals to High Court Appeals to Suprem...
Read more