Legal History-Administration in Calcutta before 1726


All right, legal administration in Kolkata all started with above building. Brief story goes like this. Englishmen arrived in Kolkata in 1690 under the leadership of Job Charnock at Sutanati, place on the bank of river Hoogly. They constructed fortified factory named Fort William.

Initially, they secured Zamindari rights of three villages named Calcutta, Sutanati and Govindpur. Grandson of Aurangzeb was Subedar of Bengal, and Aurangazeb was still ruling from Delhi. Nawab of Murshidabad had considerable power during those time.

Mughal granted company the rights to administer their settlement. Slowly slowly Company started ruling nearby areas. They started to administer the justice under their zamindari. And they introduced India to the post of collector..!!

Collector the superman

In 1699, Calcutta became the presidency town. In 1700 they introduce the officer named as collector.

Collector was like superman in those days too, because of below reason


  • He was member of Governor and Council
  • He used to decide civil cases in a summary manner. Summary manner mean super fast without procedure with due diligence.
  • He have to collect the revenues for peasants and farmer and other earning folks
  • He used to impose fine as well like whipping, fine,imprisonment etc.
  • He have to take cognisance of crimes as well
  • In case death penalty is imposed, it has to be confirmed by Governor and Council, and if area is outside of company's jurisdiction, then confirmation has to be taken from Nawab of Murshidabad.



Parallel Administration

 Some towns were under jurisdiction of British, whereas some not. In these town, villages there was Zamindari Court.

Also there were Kazi's court deciding Civil and Criminal Cases. Kazi's court was present in Each District (Sarkar), Parganah, City and even in large villages. Generally, people were satisfied with this particular system. There was also proper hierarchy, meaning village panchayat's decision could be challenged in Kazi's court of District, then District court decision could be challenged in Subaa.

At some places these courts were corrupt too, which used to exercise the power in arbitrary manner.

Summary

 In short, whole system was executive oriented. Collector was member of executive and decide to do all judicial administration.
Collector was overpowered and overburdened. Can really a same person collect revenue, maintain law and order, decide civil cases, decide criminal cases, eat foot, run a family and sleep possible ?

Neither the Mughal administration was effective.

Neverthless this system continued till 1726, when Charter of 1726 introduced some changes.



Thanks.
Legalfundaa

(Please point out any inadvertent inaccuracies in above article in comments)

Comments

Post a Comment

Followers

Popular posts from this blog

Privileges and Immunities to Administration in Suits

Introduction You know government can enter into contracts. Government can start some business. It mean government can sue other people, or you can sue the government. Before you initiate a legal proceedings against government, or even after legal proceedings are initiated, there are some relaxations to government.( OK, we will use Government/Administration as per our discretion interchangeably in this post, but they will mean the same ). So, it might happen that to prove something you may need a document or evidence, but government may be given exemption to produce evidence in that regard. Let's take one example.  General law is that burden of proof is on prosecution. Meaning, the one who accuses other  needs to prove the crime/offence by other. But when government accuses you of Sedition, you have to prove your innocence, burden of proof is on YOU. This is scary, as many times government in power just accuses people of sedition who opposes their ideas/policies, and put opponents i
Read more

Legal History-Administration of Justice in Bombay (1668-1726)

Image
Story About Bombay In 1534, Portuguese acquired Bombay from Local Hindu Raja. Then Bombay was given to King Charles II as dowry in his sister's marriage to in 1661. In 1668 Bombay was given to rent to East India Company for a rent of 10  £ . By today's exchange it would be around 100 Rs. So  yes, Bombay was given on rent to East India Company for the price of 10 Vada-Pav. Administration of Bombay was subordinate to Surat back then. After renting it, company issued a charter in 1668 granting company some rights to make laws to deal with Bombay. Like Administration in Madras, development of Earlier administration could be studied in 3 stages. First Stage: 1670-1683 (Aungier Eara) During this period Bombay was subordinated to Surat. The Governor of Surat was ex-officio Governor of Bombay, though Bombay had Deputy Governor and Council. Gerald Aungier brought some changes in Administration of justice. Two plans, i.e plan of 1670 and plan of 1672 made progress in sou
Read more

Civil Procedure Code - Summoning and attendance of Witness (Order 16)

Image
There are tons of stages after plaint/WS is submitted and final judgment is given. Below are certain stages. In this blog We will deal with Order 16 i.e Summoning and attendance of witness. Order 16 have 21 rules. These rules mainly deals with How to summon the witness ? Who can summon the witness ? What if witness do not appear after summons ? How Summons are to be served ? Who will bear the cost when witness appears? All in all, it deals with below things: Now party can give a list of witness to court to be summoned or court can sometime on it's own accord order the attendance of witness or production of documents from Witness as per Rule 14 of Order 21. General Procedure When Court summon on the request of parties, procedure is something like First party will submit the list of witness to court withing 15 days of settlement of issues. Court will issue summons based on list. Witness can attend without summons also as per Rule 1A Court issues the
Read more