CrPC - Schedule 2 - Form 20 : Order For The Removal Of Nuisance

 

FORM No. 20

ORDER FOR THE REMOVAL OF NUISANCES

(See section 133)

To _________ (name, description and address)
WHEREAS it has been made to _________ to me that you have caused an obstruction (or nuisance) to person using the public roadway (or other public place) Which, etc _________ (describe the road or public) by, etc. _________, (state what it is that cause the obstruction or nuisance), and that such obstruction (or nuisance) still exits;

or

WHEREAS it has been made to _________ to me that you are carrying on, as owner, or manager, the trade or occupation of _________ (state the particular trade or occupation and the place where it is carried on), and that the same is injurious to the public health (or comfort) by reason _________ (state briefly) in what manner the injurious effects are caused), and should be suppressed or removed to a different place.

or

WHEREAS it has been made to _________ to me that you are the owner (or are in possession of or have the control over) a certain and (or well or excavation) adjacent to the public way _________ (describe the thoroughfare), and that the safety of the public is endangered by reason of the said tank (or well or excavation) being without a fence (or insecurely fenced);

or

WHEREAS, etc., etc., (as the case may be);
I do hereby direct and require you within _________ (state the time allowed) _________ (state what is required to be done to abate the nuisance) or to _________ at _________ in Court of _________ on the _________ day of _________ next, and to show cause why this order should not be enforced;

or

I do hereby direct and require you within _________ (state the time allowed) to cease carrying on the said trade or occupation at the said place, and not again to carry on the same, or to remove the said trade from the place where it is now carried on, or to _________, etc.;

or

I do hereby direct and require you within _________ (state the time allowed) to put up a sufficient fence _________ (state the kind of fence and the part to be fenced); or to _________, etc.;
I do hereby direct and require you, etc., etc., (as the case may be).

Dated, this _________ day of _________, 20 _________

(Seal of the Court)                                                                                                 (Signature)

Comments

Post a Comment

Followers

Popular posts from this blog

Privileges and Immunities to Administration in Suits

Introduction You know government can enter into contracts. Government can start some business. It mean government can sue other people, or you can sue the government. Before you initiate a legal proceedings against government, or even after legal proceedings are initiated, there are some relaxations to government.( OK, we will use Government/Administration as per our discretion interchangeably in this post, but they will mean the same ). So, it might happen that to prove something you may need a document or evidence, but government may be given exemption to produce evidence in that regard. Let's take one example.  General law is that burden of proof is on prosecution. Meaning, the one who accuses other  needs to prove the crime/offence by other. But when government accuses you of Sedition, you have to prove your innocence, burden of proof is on YOU. This is scary, as many times government in power just accuses people of sedition who opposes their ideas/policies, and put oppone...
Read more

Legal History-Administration of Justice in Bombay (1668-1726)

Image
Story About Bombay In 1534, Portuguese acquired Bombay from Local Hindu Raja. Then Bombay was given to King Charles II as dowry in his sister's marriage to in 1661. In 1668 Bombay was given to rent to East India Company for a rent of 10  £ . By today's exchange it would be around 100 Rs. So  yes, Bombay was given on rent to East India Company for the price of 10 Vada-Pav. Administration of Bombay was subordinate to Surat back then. After renting it, company issued a charter in 1668 granting company some rights to make laws to deal with Bombay. Like Administration in Madras, development of Earlier administration could be studied in 3 stages. First Stage: 1670-1683 (Aungier Eara) During this period Bombay was subordinated to Surat. The Governor of Surat was ex-officio Governor of Bombay, though Bombay had Deputy Governor and Council. Gerald Aungier brought some changes in Administration of justice. Two plans, i.e plan of 1670 and plan of 1672 made progress in so...
Read more

Legal History-Madras Settlement (1639-1726)

British established it's first factory in Surat. As they expanded they established factories in other town such as Madras, Calcutta and Bombay. Francis Day got piece of land from Hindu king for the East India Company in 1639. East India Company got a town named as "Madraspatanam". (Don't tell this to UP CM Yogi, or else he will rename Madras). British Established fortified factory were Englishmen would stay. Till 1665, Madras was subordinate to Surat. Now town was divided into two divisions. In fortified area, Englishmen and European used to stay which was known as "White Town", whereas villagers stayed outside were known as "Black Town" Study of development of legal administration is divided into three stages. We can divide in as many stages as we want, provided we have certain distinguishing criteria for each division. Let's see each stage with some more details. First Stage-1639-1665 (Black town, white town, choultry court) Th...
Read more