CrPC - Schedule 2 - Form 16 : Warrant Of Commitment On Failure To Find Security For Good Behaviour


FORM No. 16
WARRANT OF COMMITMENT ON FAILURE TO FIND SECURITY FOR GOOD BEHAVIOUR
(See section 122)


To the Officer in charge of the jail at _________

WHEREAS it has been made to appear to me that _________ (name and description) has been concealing his presence within the district of _________ and that there is reason to believe that he is doing so with a view to committing a cognizable offence.

or

WHEREAS evidence of the general character of _________ (name and description) has been adduced before me and recorded, from which it appears that he is an habitual robber (or house-breaker, etc., as the case may be);

And whereas an order has been recorded station the same and requiring the said _________ (name) to furnish security for his good behavior for the term of _________ (state the period) by entering into a bend with one surety (or two or more sureties, as the case may be), himself for rupees _________, and the said surety (or each of the said sureties) or rupees _________ and the said _________ (name) has failed to comply with the said order and for such default has been adjudged imprisonment for _________ (state the term) unless the said security by sooner furnished;

This is to authorised and require you to receive the said _________ (name) into your custody, together with this warrant and him safely to keep in the Jail, or if he already in prison, be detained therein, for the aid period of _________ (term of imprisonment) unless he shall in the meantime be lawfully ordered to be released, and to return this warrant with an endorsement certifying the manner of its execution.

Dated, this _________ day of _________, 20 _________

(Seal of the Court)                                                                                                 (Signature)

Comments

Post a Comment

Followers

Popular posts from this blog

Privileges and Immunities to Administration in Suits

Introduction You know government can enter into contracts. Government can start some business. It mean government can sue other people, or you can sue the government. Before you initiate a legal proceedings against government, or even after legal proceedings are initiated, there are some relaxations to government.( OK, we will use Government/Administration as per our discretion interchangeably in this post, but they will mean the same ). So, it might happen that to prove something you may need a document or evidence, but government may be given exemption to produce evidence in that regard. Let's take one example.  General law is that burden of proof is on prosecution. Meaning, the one who accuses other  needs to prove the crime/offence by other. But when government accuses you of Sedition, you have to prove your innocence, burden of proof is on YOU. This is scary, as many times government in power just accuses people of sedition who opposes their ideas/policies, and put oppone...
Read more

Legal History-Administration of Justice in Bombay (1668-1726)

Image
Story About Bombay In 1534, Portuguese acquired Bombay from Local Hindu Raja. Then Bombay was given to King Charles II as dowry in his sister's marriage to in 1661. In 1668 Bombay was given to rent to East India Company for a rent of 10  £ . By today's exchange it would be around 100 Rs. So  yes, Bombay was given on rent to East India Company for the price of 10 Vada-Pav. Administration of Bombay was subordinate to Surat back then. After renting it, company issued a charter in 1668 granting company some rights to make laws to deal with Bombay. Like Administration in Madras, development of Earlier administration could be studied in 3 stages. First Stage: 1670-1683 (Aungier Eara) During this period Bombay was subordinated to Surat. The Governor of Surat was ex-officio Governor of Bombay, though Bombay had Deputy Governor and Council. Gerald Aungier brought some changes in Administration of justice. Two plans, i.e plan of 1670 and plan of 1672 made progress in so...
Read more

Legal History-Madras Settlement (1639-1726)

British established it's first factory in Surat. As they expanded they established factories in other town such as Madras, Calcutta and Bombay. Francis Day got piece of land from Hindu king for the East India Company in 1639. East India Company got a town named as "Madraspatanam". (Don't tell this to UP CM Yogi, or else he will rename Madras). British Established fortified factory were Englishmen would stay. Till 1665, Madras was subordinate to Surat. Now town was divided into two divisions. In fortified area, Englishmen and European used to stay which was known as "White Town", whereas villagers stayed outside were known as "Black Town" Study of development of legal administration is divided into three stages. We can divide in as many stages as we want, provided we have certain distinguishing criteria for each division. Let's see each stage with some more details. First Stage-1639-1665 (Black town, white town, choultry court) Th...
Read more